Vol. 2026 No. 1 (2026): 2026 Continuous Issue
Articles

Dr. AI Dependency vs. Doctoral Identity: How Generative AI is Challenging the Development of Independent Scholarly Thinking in Doctoral Students

PDF
  • Valerie Storey
Valerie Storey
Franklin University

Published 2026-03-16

Versions

Keywords

  • AI policy, doctoral education, doctoral identity, epistemic dependency, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), independent scholarship

How to Cite

Storey, V. (2026). Dr. AI Dependency vs. Doctoral Identity: How Generative AI is Challenging the Development of Independent Scholarly Thinking in Doctoral Students. International Journal of AI in Pedagogy, Innovation, and Learning Futures, 2026(1). Retrieved from https://journals.calstate.edu/ijaipil/article/view/6971

Copyright (c) 2026 Valerie Storey

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has altered the conditions under which doctoral students learn, research, and develop as scholars. Although doctoral student use of GenAI has accelerated rapidly, institutional frameworks for responsible and developmentally appropriate use have not kept pace. This paper examines a central paradox in doctoral education: the same tools that enhance research productivity may also weaken intellectual independence when used without guidance. Using a critical review methodology, the study synthesizes 47 sources on doctoral education, GenAI use, policy, and epistemic development. Three interconnected dimensions of risk emerged from the analysis: critical thinking attrition, knowledge authenticity erosion, and doctoral identity disruption. The paper introduces a conceptual distinction between AI as a productivity instrument and AI as a surrogate for independent scholarship, arguing that this distinction should guide doctoral AI policy. At the same time, the review recognizes that GenAI can support doctoral learning when institutions provide developmental boundaries, competency-based guidance, and active supervision.

PDF

References

  1. Abduljabbar, D. A., et al. (2024). Enhancing academic integrity among students in the GenAI era: A holistic framework. Nurse Education in Practice, 77, 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103978
  2. AI Leadership to Enable Accountable Deployment (AI LEAD) Act, S. 2293, 118th Cong. (2023). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2293
  3. American Association of University Professors. (2025). Artificial intelligence and academic professions. https://www.aaup.org/reports-publications/aaup-policies-reports/topical-reports/artificial-intelligence-and-academic
  4. Arar, K.H., Özen, H., Polat, G. (2025). Artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence and research integrity: A hybrid systemic review. Smart Learning. Environments 12(44), 1-29 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00403-3
  5. Association of Community College Trustees. (2025, November 14). FIPSE funding under the second Trump administration. https://perspectives.acct.org/stories/fipse-funding-under-the-second-trump-administration
  6. Azevedo, L., Mallinson, D. J., Wang, J., Robles, P., & Best, E. (2024). AI policies, equity, and morality and the implications for faculty in higher education. Public Integrity, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2024.2414957
  7. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
  8. Biden, J. R. (2023, October 30). Executive Order 14110: Safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence. 88 Fed. Reg. 75191. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/01/2023-24283/safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence
  9. Bittle, S., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Examining academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI: A case study of faculty perspectives. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1621743. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1621743
  10. Brandon, E., Eaton, L., Gavin, D., & Papini, A. (2025). In the room where it happens: Generative AI policy creation in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2025/5/in-the-room-where-it-happens-generative-ai-policy-creation-in-higher-education
  11. Chen, L. H. (2025). Doctoral students' academic identity development under supervision: Issues, challenges, and suggestions. International Journal of Educational Management, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2025-0189
  12. Choi, Y., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., & Ermis, G. (2021). Doctoral students' identity development as scholars in the education sciences: Literature review and implications. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 89–125. https://doi.org/10.28945/4168
  13. Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Jordan, K. (2025). Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence policies in universities across five countries. Discover Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09745-5
  14. Da Mota, M. (2024). Toward an AI policy framework for research institutions. In E. Editor (Ed.), Artificial intelligence (pp. 1–17). Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/toward-an-ai-policy-framework-for-research-institutions/
  15. Ennis, R. (2011). Critical thinking: reflection and perspective. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4–18. https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/citations?openform=&fp=inquiryct&id=inquiryct_2011_0026_0001_0004_0018
  16. European University Association Council for Doctoral Education. (2026). Doctoral education survey: AI in doctoral research. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/two-thirds-universities-report-ai-use-among-doctoral-students
  17. Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2024). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
  18. Federal Register. (2025, November 12). Applications for new awards; Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education — Special Projects (FIPSE-SP). 90 FR 58903 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/11/12/2025-19843/applications-for-new-awards-fund-for-the-improvement-of-postsecondary-education-special-projects
  19. Freeman, J. (2025). Student generative AI survey 2025 (HEPI Policy Note 61). Higher Education Policy Institute; Kortext. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2025/02/26/student-generative-ai-survey-2025/
  20. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
  21. Goodwin Law. (2025, August 11). Federal AI moratorium dies on the vine as Senate passes the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/07/alerts-practices-aiml-federal-ai-moratorium-dies-on-the-vine
  22. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  23. Harris, M., Soriano, N. E., & Ralston, N. (2025). An examination of the use of AI (artificial intelligence) technology as experienced by scholarly practitioners in an educational doctorate program. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 10(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.472
  24. Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., Woo, L., & Oster, N. (2025). The education doctorate in the context of generative artificial intelligence: Epistemic shifts and challenges to practical wisdom. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 10(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2025.485
  25. Hoomanfard, M. H., & Shamsi, Y. (2025). Generative AI in dissertation writing: L2 doctoral students' self-reported use, AI-giarism, and perceived training needs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 78,101570, 1-11.
  26. Hou, Y. (2025). Thinking with ChatGPT: An autoethnographic inquiry into epistemic transformation in higher education. Artificial Intelligence in Educational Research, 2(2), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17764013
  27. Inside Higher Ed & Hanover Research. (2024a). 2024 survey of college and university presidents. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/governance/executive-leadership/2024/02/29/presidents-survey-finds-optimism-amid-uncertainty
  28. Inside Higher Ed & Hanover Research. (2024b). 2024 survey of college and university chief academic officers. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/governance/executive-leadership/2024/04/16/provosts-survey-shows-need-ai-policies-speech
  29. Iskender, A. (2023). Holy or unholy? Interview with open AI’s ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research, 34, 3414. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169
  30. Jayasinghe, S. (2024). Promoting active learning with ChatGPT: a constructivist approach in Sri Lankan higher education. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 7(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.26
  31. Jiang, Y. (2025). Exploring the effectiveness of institutional policies and regulations for generative AI usage in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70054
  32. Jiang, Y., Kambhampati, S., & Chen, M. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions' guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
  33. Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
  34. Kizilcec, R. F., Huber, E., Papanastasiou, E. C., Cram, A., Makridis, C. A., Smolansky, A., Zeivots, S., & Raduescu, C. (2024). Perceived impact of generative AI on assessments: comparing educator and student perspectives in Australia, Cyprus, and the United States. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7,1-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269
  35. Kofinas, A. K., Tsay, C. H., & Pike, D. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 2522–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585
  36. Lewin, S., Bohren, M., Rashidian, A., Munthe-Kaas, H., Glenton, C., Colvin, C. J., Garside, R., Noyes, J., Booth, A., Tunçalp, Ö., Sheikk, K., Wainwright, M., & Tugwell, P. (2019). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings — Paper 2: How to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a summary of qualitative findings table. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0467-5
  37. Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 4(7), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779
  38. Ma, X., Yiran. L., Peiyao, L., & Dervin, F. (2026). The impact of GenAI on epistemic construction, friction and regulation: Doctoral researchers' duoethnography. European Journal of Education, 61, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70330
  39. McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Collier, A. H. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence for academic research: Evidence from guidance issued for researchers by higher education institutions in the United States. AI and Ethics 5, 3917–3933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00688-7
  40. Mensah, F. (2025). The 50% tipping point: Addressing doctoral student attrition through institutional innovation. Journal of College Academic Support Programs, 7(1). https://jcasp-ojs-txstate.tdl.org/jcasp/article/view/201
  41. Mowreader, A. (2024, September 16). Survey: When should college students use AI? They're not sure. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2024/09/16/college-students-uncertain-about-ai-policies
  42. Ocen S., Elasu J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025) Artificial intelligence in higher education institutions: review of innovations, opportunities and challenges. Frontier Education, 10(1530247), 1-12. doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247
  43. Pattison, H. (2026, February 26). Agentic AI can complete whole courses. Now what? Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/tech-innovation/artificial-intelligence/2026/02/26/agentic-ai-can-complete-whole-courses-now
  44. Rasky, E. (2024). Generative AI policy in higher education: A preliminary survey. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/generative-ai-policy-in-higher-education-a-preliminary-survey/
  45. Robert, J., & McCormack, M. (2025, February 17). EDUCAUSE AI landscape study: Into the digital AI divide. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2025/2/2025-educause-ai-landscape-study
  46. Salido, A., Syarif, I., Suparjan, Wana, P.R., Sitepu, M. S., & Melisa, R. (2025). Mapping the landscape of critical thinking skills in higher education in the AI era: a bibliometric and systematic literature review. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 8(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2025.23
  47. Sánchez-Ruiz, L. M., Moll-López, S., & Moraño-Fernández, J. A. (2025). Utilizing generative AI responsibly and ethically for research purposes in higher education: A policy analysis. Serials Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2025.2581429
  48. Sarwanti, S., Sariasih, Y., Rahmatika, L., Islam, M. M., & Riantina, E. M. (2024). Are they literate on ChatGPT? University language students’ perceptions, benefits and challenges in higher education learning. Online Learning, 28(3), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4599
  49. Schuman, R. (2026, March 5). Will agentic AI break higher education? The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/will-agentic-ai-break-higher-education
  50. Siegal, A., & Garcia, I. (2024, October 26). A deep dive into Colorado's Artificial Intelligence Act. National Association of Attorneys General. https://www.naag.org/attorney-general-journal/a-deep-dive-into-colorados-artificial-intelligence-act/
  51. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
  52. The American Presidency Project. (2025). Executive Order 14179: Removing barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-14179-removing-barriers-american-leadership-artificial-intelligence
  53. Time. (2025, July 1). Senators reject 10-year ban on state-level AI regulation. https://time.com/7299044/senators-reject-10-year-ban-on-state-level-ai-regulation-in-blow-to-big-tech/
  54. Trump, D. J. (2025, April 23). Executive Order 14277: Advancing artificial intelligence education for American youth. 90 Fed. Reg. 17519. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-202500511
  55. UNESCO. (2025, September 2). UNESCO survey: Two-thirds of higher education institutions have or are developing guidance on AI use. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-two-thirds-higher-education-institutions-have-or-are-developing-guidance-ai-use
  56. U.S. Department of Education. (2025a, July 22). Guidance on the use of federal grant funds to improve outcomes for learners through the responsible integration of artificial intelligence. Dear Colleague Letter. https://www.ed.gov/media/document/opepd-ai-dear-colleague-letter-7222025-110427.pdf
  57. U.S. Department of Education. (2025b, July 21). Proposed priority and definitions: Secretary’s supplemental priority and definitions on advancing artificial intelligence in education. 90 Fed. Reg. 34203. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/07/21/2025-13650/proposed-priority-and-definitions-secretarys-supplemental-priority-and-definitions-on-advancing
  58. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2024a). Designing for education with artificial intelligence: An essential guide for developers. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2024/07/Designing-for-Education-with-Artificial-Intelligence-An-Essential-Guide-for-Developers.pdf
  59. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2024b). Empowering education leaders: A toolkit for safe, ethical, and equitable AI integration. https://tech.ed.gov/ai/
  60. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf
  61. Xiao, P., Chen, Y., & Bao, W. (2023, May 25). Waiting, banning, and embracing: An empirical analysis of adapting policies for generative AI in higher education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18614
  62. Xu, X., et al. (2025). Enhancing self-regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. British Journal of Educational Technology 6, 1842–1863. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599
  63. Wang, V., & Ellington, L. (2026). Harnessing AI for dissertation success: a chair and methodologist’s guide. The International Journal of AI in Pedagogy, Innovation, and Learning Futures, 1(2026) Continuous Issue. https://journals.calstate.edu/ijaipil/issue/view/567
  64. Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
  65. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022, October). Blueprint for an AI bill of rights: Making automated systems work for the American people. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
  66. Zhai, X., et al. (2025). The role of over-reliance on AI in the negative consequences of student learning. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2591503