Vol. 2 No. 1 (2027): AI Literacy, Workforce Learning, and Human–AI Futures
Articles

Liberating IT Graduates in the AI Era: Moving Beyond Graduate Attributes.

Published 2026-05-08

Keywords

  • Graduate attributes,
  • IT degrees,
  • IT curriculum,
  • AI,
  • Liberal education

How to Cite

Torrisi-Steele, G. (2026). Liberating IT Graduates in the AI Era: Moving Beyond Graduate Attributes. International Journal of AI in Pedagogy, Innovation, and Learning Futures, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.46787/ijaipil.v2i1.7300

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is reshaping information technology (IT) practice, shifting professional capability from technical execution to judgement through socio-technical understanding. This has significant implications for the curricula of university IT degrees. In a highly competitive higher-education landscape getting and keeping students is paramount to institutional survival. A major driver for attracting students to IT is the promise of abundant, well-paid IT careers.  Subsequently, universities are scrambling to re-align their IT curricula with the rapidly changing needs of industry – amid this is increased emphasis on graduate attributes. The reliance by many universities on “graduate attributes” as defining the quality of programs is at odds with the realities of AI-mediated work especially in the IT industry.  Additionally, for too long IT education has prioritized technical knowledge over human-centered capabilities such as adaptability, development of judgement and social-technical awareness. IT systems are embedded within complex human contexts hence socio-technical capabilities are foundational rather than supplementary to professional practice in IT.  AI technologies exacerbate the need for human-centered capabilities in professional practice and displace technical knowledge as the most fundamental layer in IT curricula. A case is made for a critical reframing of quality markers for IT program curricular: from a compliance-driven paradigm of discrete graduate attributes that are fragmented, to a liberal paradigm providing for educating IT graduates as adaptive, socio-technical thinkers who engage critically with AI-mediated environments. The argument is not for abandoning graduate attributes, but for reinterpreting and enacting them through a liberal education framework at the level of IT program design.

References

  1. Boyle, M. E. (2019). Global liberal education: Theorizing emergence and variability. Research in Comparative & International Education, 14(2) 231-248.
  2. Braue , D. (2026, February 03). University ICT enrolments down in 2026. https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2026/university-ict-enrolments-down-in-2026.html
  3. Cash, D. (2026, April 19). Young workers need honesty about the impact of AI on jobs. https://www.afr.com/technology/young-workers-need-honesty-about-the-impact-of-ai-on-jobs-20260415-p5zo4t
  4. IntuitionLabs. (2025). AI's Impact on Graduate Jobs: A 2025 Data Analysis. https://intuitionlabs.ai/articles/ai-impact-graduate-jobs-2025
  5. Ramirez, E. (2026, February 2). University ICT Enrolments Decline in Australia 2026 Despite Government Efforts. https://www.academicjobs.com/au/higher-education-news/university-ict-enrolments-decline-australia-2026-3020
  6. Turner, K., Gunaesekara, A., Yuan, F., & Stough, C. (2025). Exploring the alignment between Australian university graduate attributes and emotional intelligence competencies. The Curriculum Journal., 36, 236–254.
  7. Wong, B., Chiu, Y., Copsey-Blake, M., & Nikolopoulou, M. (2022). A mapping of graduate attributes: what can we expect from UK university students? Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1340–1355.