The Oversimplification of Rural Women of the Mexican Revolution

Abstract

Historical research of the Mexican Revolution (1910-1920) has often been concerned with key conflicts, revolutionary leaders, or the various forms of participation by men. Women, however, are frequently forgotten about, with many of their efforts diminished by overly vague language, or limited by inherently patriarchal archetypes, such as the soldadera. Even as historians make efforts to dismantle problematic narratives, many still reinforce sexist rhetoric, even if unintentionally. Analysis of literature, such as John Reed's Insurgent Mexico and Margarita Robles de Mendoza’s feminist articles, and corridos, such as "La Adelita" or "Valentina," from the period reveal the origins of rural women's dismissal by popular narratives. By examining these key primary sources and contrasting the attitudes surrounding these women against modern historical research, this paper argues that modern scholars have continued to echo problematic narratives regarding rural women of the Mexican Revolution. Additionally, this paper highlights prominent efforts by specific authors, such as B. Christine Arce, whose attempts to demystify the patriarchal perspectives of the Mexican Revolution begin with dismantling the sexist and limiting discussions of these women.